Charllene : 1933: Zionists sign a deal with Hitler

1933: Zionists sign a deal with Hitler - The Transfer Agreement

You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.

Pages: 1 2 3 4

The Comedian [ -> ]Wrote: (05-06-2012 05:36 PM)

Richard Eldritch [ -> ]Wrote: (03-10-2012 09:40 PM)
golda n uranium [ -> ]Wrote: (03-10-2012 09:13 PM)
Dumbshit here hasn't read Edwin's book.

Do you do anything except fail, Richard?

I could use the BBS production "The World at War" to make this same point.

My favorite parts are where they interview the head of the luftwaffe who says the UK attack was a 100% joke, a fake.

I also liked seeing Avril Harriman and others. The UK made a great series with that one.

I also liked the one English guy who says it's a bloody miracle they got their men off Dunkirk. Of course rommel was on a tight leash at that point. Rommel could have taken the Nazis all the way to Hadrian's wall if the luftwaffe had backed him up correctly.

But it's true, the Nazis got some help from London and America. WW2 was manipulated and I am amazed you can't see who won. Who got their own state? Who got secret nukes while not being party to the NPT?

You'll twist any history to fit your Nazi Agenda. Strange how every historian worth their salt not to mention the journalists are wrong or shills isn't it? Only a You tube video is proof and only the brain dead conspiracy loons hold the truth. Pfffft......

^ This ^

Deniers

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haavara_Agreement

you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink

Deadhorse1

LoP Guest [ -> ]Wrote: (07-04-2012 05:15 PM)

Deniers

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haavara_Agreement

It was no agreement, you loser moron Loser

that is where the Nazis told the Jews to GET OUT

Klink [ -> ]Wrote: (07-04-2012 05:11 PM)

Theodore Herzl worked for Rothschild's Zionist Congress. Rothschild was a papal knight running the Vatican's empire. The Jesuits created Zionism.

• [b]Zionism, not Jewish but Jesuit[/b]

1517, All over Europe the Pope was called The AntiChrist. This prophetic teaching (historicist) was playing havoc with the Roman Church. Millions were escaping and obeying the Lord's command to "come out of her" (Rev. 18:4).

The first Jesuit Superior General Ignatius of Loyola commissioned one of his Jesuits named Francisco Ribera (1537-1591) to write an opposing view. He wrote a 500 page commentary on the Book of Revelation. The main premise of his commentary was that:

(1) Antichrist was one man.. not a empire.
(2) He would be an atheist or infidel.
(3) He would not be revealed until 7 years before the end of time.
(4) He would sit in a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem and make a covenant with the Jews.
(5) He would call himself God etc., etc.
(6) The Christians were hindering his appearance but they would be "caught up" raptured to Heaven before his appearance -- the "Left Behind" madness!!

This became the official Roman Catholic position on Antichrist. This new idea (futurism) very conveniently shifted the focus from the Papacy to some fanciful individual way off in the distant future. John Nelson Darby became its main proponent in the English speaking world.

In order to make this "prophecy" come true Jews had to somehow get back to Palestine.

The mighty nation of ancient Israel perished by the Roman sword in 70 A.D., in exact fulfillment of the words of Jesus The Temple was leveled to the ground and not one stone was left upon another that was not thrown down.

Zionism was realized after WW I with the British Conquest of Palestine. Still, most of the Jews were not interested in going there. After all, most of them were living comfortably in Germany and they had no interest in helping Ribera fulfill his futurism.

Hitler and WW II changed all that. In 1948, the State of Israel was declared and the survivors of the Holocaust had nowhere to go but to Palestine.
http://www.reformation.org/mideast_crisis.html
http://www.aloha.net/~mikesch/antichrist.htm

don't you ever get tired of misdirection?

So what is the problem? Germany wanted to get rid of Jews AND stop a boycott that had reduced their exports by 10%. Zionist Jews wanted to get Jews into Palestine. In the end the Jews who wanted to stay in Germany were wrong and the Zionists saved some 55,000 Jews from extermination. Put that into your Jewish hatred pipe and smoke it. It just amazes me how much hatred for Jews I find on conspiracy sites.

LoP Guest [ -> ]Wrote: (03-10-2012 08:03 PM)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3we8Sg9o...ntrinter=1

Wow ! didn't know very good information

pacific_waters [ -> ]Wrote: (07-04-2012 05:40 PM)

So what is the problem? Germany wanted to get rid of Jews AND stop a boycott that had reduced their exports by 10%. Zionist Jews wanted to get Jews into Palestine. In the end the Jews who wanted to stay in Germany were wrong and the Zionists saved some 55,000 Jews from extermination. Put that into your Jewish hatred pipe and smoke it. It just amazes me how much hatred for Jews I find on conspiracy sites.

I think it's more directed to Zionism, but if it revolves around Zionism, Lubavitch movement, Noahide laws and the Babylonian Talmud it's usually seen as hate no matter what has been said.

edit:

I like to talk about things that affect me, the 7 Noahide laws are for the gentiles so it affects me too , so I want to talk about these things. Pretty logical if you ask me, I want to know the full truth when someone wants to see seperate laws for a certain kind of people and different laws for the majority of people in the world (the gentiles). And besides, better to spew hate than to keep it bottled up, going around yelling that people just have to shut up as they are hating really doesn't help and makes matters even worse, bottled up feeling tend to explode when shit hits the fan, better to talk before it happens.

pacific_waters [ -> ]Wrote: (07-04-2012 05:40 PM)

So what is the problem? Germany wanted to get rid of Jews AND stop a boycott that had reduced their exports by 10%. Zionist Jews wanted to get Jews into Palestine. In the end the Jews who wanted to stay in Germany were wrong and the Zionists saved some 55,000 Jews from extermination. Put that into your Jewish hatred pipe and smoke it. It just amazes me how much hatred for Jews I find on conspiracy sites.

actually, the Germans did have some right to be angry. as Benjamin Freedman, an insider who converted, revealed, the Zionists went to the British government as it faced surrender (under favorable terms, mind you) and offered to use its control of the press in America to bring the USA into the war. in exchange, Lord Rothschild was to receive the Mandate of Palestine as a Jewish Homeland. there was also a glaring wealth disparity between jews and ethnic germans, and that only added to the friction.

so, now you get to the 30's and there are some attacks on jewish business owners in Germany. world Jewry, the non-elites or common men, reacted with a boycott. this would have brought Germany to its knees and led to Hitler losing power and a resulting regime change. Zionism would have no part in this. Zionism needed two things, money and people willing to work physical labor like farming, not a traditional jewish occupation. so what did the Zionist elites do? they betrayed the jewish common man. the Zionists went behind world jewry's back and collaborated with the Nazis. the Transfer Agreement did not just transfer jews and the wealth to Palestine. the Collaboration raped the wealth of german jews, splitting much of it between the German government and Zionist government, while turning the once well-to-do jew into a modest, hardworking farmer. the Zionists also served as middlemen selling German goods in the middle east. this is what allowed the German industrial, and therefore war, machine to blossom into the formidable force that wrecked both europe and russia.

this has nothing to do with hatred for jews. jews were victims of zionists who stabbed them in the back. you're simply an ignorant fool, played like a fiddle by a hollywood version of history and yellow journalism.

The FreakMasons founded Israel. As Templars they ran all sides of the war for the Jesuits.

Zionism is a plan for Israel and that is all. There are no "zionists". You are looking for FREEMASONS

Rothschild was a Freemason and baron knight

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_family

Nazi Party - Teutonic Knights

Stalin - Freemason, see hidden hand pics

FDR - Freemason

Churchill - Freemason

Japan Emperor - Order of the Garter

Bankers - Templars

All sides were ran by these Templar founded societies of Knights. The people lost - Jews, Protestants, Orthodox, and other minorities on all sides.

The first act of ww2 was against Protestant Prussia

• 1932 coup d'etat in Prussia

Prussia was a pillar of democracy in the Weimar Republic. This system was destroyed by the PreuBenschlag (Prussian coup) of Reich Chancellor Franz von Papen. In this coup d'etat, the government of the Reich unseated the Prussian government on 20 July 1932, under the pretext that the latter had lost control of public order in Prussia. Papen appointed himself Reich commissioner for Prussia and took control of the government. The PreuBenschlag made it easier, only half a year later, for Adolf Hitler to take power decisively in Germany, since he had the whole apparatus of the Prussian government, including the police, at his disposal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prussia#The...r_Republic

http://liberalslikechrist.org/Catholic/N...rship.html

http://www.archive.org/details/VaticansHolocaust
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KD_lBstvptE

this is an amazing story, in spite of all the side stories, so many are 'going off' on.
I would say that the medallion with a star of david on one side, and a swaztika on the other, must be very precious.

anti-semitic post reported, soon to be smurfed

LoP Guest [ -> ]Wrote: (03-10-2012 08:03 PM)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o3we8Sg9o...ntrinter=1

Wow ! didn't know very good information

Really you nazi? So the Jews wanted to be thrown into ovens alive? Yeah its a big conspiracy, the Jews are getting rich taking 1 cent of your pay checks to get rich.

How about you grow a set, drop the racism, and take responsibility for your own failures. Scream1

LoP Guest [ -> ]Wrote: (07-04-2012 07:17 PM)

The FreakMasons founded Israel. As Templars they ran all sides of the war for the Jesuits.

Zionism is a plan for Israel and that is all. There are no "zionists". You are looking for FREEMASONS

Rothschild was a Freemason and baron knight

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_family

he wasn't born that way he was born jewish title means nothing the elites throw it around at damn near everybody

sir elton john sir paul mcartney etc..
the masonic jesuit angle is a recent distraction that has been deployed because too many people in the last decade or so have started to peel back the layers of the onion and see that all roads lead to israel

Klink [ -> ]Wrote: (07-04-2012 05:25 PM)

LoP Guest [ -> ]Wrote: (07-04-2012 05:15 PM)
Deniers

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haavara_Agreement

It was no agreement, you loser moron that is where the Nazis told the Jews to GET OUT

They unfroze money for their favored Palestine-bound Jews... Today they sell the same families nuclear powered dolphin subs.

LoP Guest [ -> ]Wrote: (05-06-2012 06:03 PM)

Quote:Imagine if China, for one reason or another suddenly replaced or supplanted the United States as Israel's main diplomatic, financial and military supporter. That the Chinese then provided Israel with all it required to continue the occupation and usurpation of Palestine and to further consolidate its illegal undertakings…What would we then make of American journalists or writers who then incessantly never fail to remind us of the culpable Chinese support for Israeli criminality while simultaneously totally ignoring, possibly even whitewashing the 40 years when the United States was Israel's main supporter?

Between 1917 and 1948 Great Britain more than any other nation helped to lay the diplomatic, governmental, military and economic foundations for Israel yet if one were to peruse British writing on Palestine, especially the writings of the supposed pro-Palestinians, one would naturally presume that the Palestinian predicament only began on the 15th May 1948 when the British Mandate officially ended and the State of Israel was declared.

As it is known, the defining document or declaration which paved the way, indeed legitimised the Jewish colonisation of Palestine was issued by Imperial Britain's Foreign Secretary, Lord Balfour. The "Balfour Declaration" announced that the British government would,

'…view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object…'

What is rarely known, is the imperial jubilance which greeted the publication of the Declaration in the British media. In the vanguard of this euphoria was the liberal Guardian or the Manchester Guardian as it was more accurately known then under the editorship of Charles P. Scott. Cutting through the diplomatic verbiage and any possible obfuscation about the intention behind the declaration, it editorialised in November 1917 that some may speak of Palestine "as a country, but it is not a country...But it will be a country; it will be the country of the Jews. That is the meaning of..." the Balfour Declaration. The fact that in 1917 the population of Palestine was 80,000 Jewish and 700,000 Arab Palestinian literally meant nothing to the Guardian editor.

It further stated that the British government's deliberate policy will be then "to encourage in every way in our power Jewish immigration...with a view to the ultimate establishment of a Jewish State."

The urge to colonise Palestine with Jewish immigration was largely motivated by its proximity to Egypt. As the Guardian stated, "Palestine has a special importance for Great Britain because in the hands of a hostile Power, it can be made...a secure base which a land attack on Egypt can be organised..." Therefore, it is in Britain's interest that "no Power should be seated in Palestine" that "is likely to be hostile" to British Imperialism.

The left-wing New Statesman too came out all guns blazing in support of the Balfour Declaration but was more specific about the nature of Palestine's proximity to the Empire’s interests. It informed its readers that the "special interest of the British Empire in Palestine is due to the proximity of the Suez Canal." The only obvious conclusion is then to imperatively "effect a Zionist restoration under British auspices."

After all, the New Statesman added, the then position of Jews as "unassimilated sojourners in every land but their own can never become satisfactory...It is far better...to make a nation of them" in the interests of Empire.

The more populist Daily Express concurred with the above interpretation of the Balfour Declaration in that it is an "announcement of a Jewish State" and also added that Jews from all over the world will be included in what it perceived to be the "colonisation scheme." The London Times declared "Palestine for the Jews" and reprinted a part of the cabinet approved declaration.

The Guardian's stance on the Balfour Declaration found congruence with the Empire’s first Military Governor of Jerusalem, Sir Ronald Storrs. He too emphasised, but in biological terms, the importance of Egypt in that it was the "jugular vein of the British Empire" and that the Jewish colonisation of Palestine would bring forth "for England 'a little loyal Jewish Ulster' in a sea of potentially hostile Arabism."

A prominent left-wing politician in this period, Colonel Josiah Wedgwood, opted for a geographical analogy to describe British interests in the Arab World. He argued that Palestine was the "Clapham Junction" of the British Empire. As such a "friendly and efficient population" is required to settle there. And because Egyptians do not want the British occupation of their country, Palestine should be settled with "men on whom we can depend, if only because they depend on us...The Jews depend on us."

For Winston Churchill, the Zionist colonisation of Palestine would mean that Jews "would be especially in harmony with the truest interests of the British Empire."

However, what distinguished the Guardian's unequivocal endorsement of the Balfour Declaration was not only the approval of Zionist colonisation, which would explicitly lead to a "Jewish State," but also just as equally the contempt it had for the indigenous Arabs of Palestine or in the words of Storrs, the "present aborigines." In the spirit of colonialism, the Guardian editorial racially degenerated and dehumanised the Arabs of Palestine as "at a low stage of civilisation" and that they contain within "itself none of the elements of progress..." In other words the Arabs of Palestine were in a state of perennial civilisational arrested development. ..."

http://mondoweiss.net/2012/04/an-account...ation.html

Some more Balfour info:

The Hidden History of the Balfour Declaration
By John Cornelius, Washington Report, November 2005 http://www.wrmea.com/archives/November_2...11044.html

Palestine, the Balfour Declaration and Why America Entered the Great War
By John Cornelius, OCTOBER/NOVEMBER 1999 http://www.washington-report.org/archive...t-war.html

The Balfour Declaration and the Zimmermann Note
By John Cornelius, August/September 1997 http://www.washington-report.org/archive...note-.html

Answering Critics of the Theory That Balfour Declaration Was Payoff for Zionist Services in WWI
By John Cornelius, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, September 1998 http://www.washington-report.org/archive...n-wwi.html

Secret Jew Drafted Balfour Declaration http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsou...mery1.html

Behind the Balfour Declaration: Britain's Great War Pledge To Lord Rothschild
By ROBERT JOHN http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC...21783.html

T.E. Lawrence (Lawrence of Arabia) on the Sykes-Picot Treaty http://mailstar.net/balfour.html

Lloyd George on the Balfour Declaration - Peter Myers, December 13, 2000 http://mailstar.net/l-george.html

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Charllene

Friday, May 1, 2015

1933: Zionists sign a deal with Hitler - The Transfer Agreement

LoP Guest

LoP Guest

Klink

freebyrd

pacific_waters

RaXz2k

Zionists are Nazis

LoP Guest

Klink

roadtoad

LoP Guest

Honest Abe

freebyrd

LoP Guest

NormalIsSubjective

No comments:

Post a Comment